Material corrections to ComeNewsSports articles are dated and logged here. Older entries remain accessible and never silently rewritten.
A material correction is anything that changes what the reader would have understood on first read: a wrong score, scorer, minute, attribution, transfer detail, or factual claim.
What we log here
Wrong scores, wrong scorers, wrong minutes, wrong substitutions, wrong transfer fees, wrong contractual details, wrong attributions, and wrong factual claims that materially change the story.
What we don't log
Typos in non-load-bearing words, headline variants, and minor phrasing changes that do not change what the reader would have understood on first read.
How a correction appears on the article
A dated note at the top of the article, in plain language, explaining what changed. Where the change is significant, the article itself is rewritten with the corrected detail and the older version is preserved in the page revision history.
The most recent material corrections, newest first. The full log is available below.
The archive of corrections published before the current quarter. Available on request from the editor.
For older corrections predating our public log, write to the editor at [email protected]. The archive covers every material correction since the desk's first publication in 2026.
How to challenge a correction, and how to submit a new one.
How do I send a new correction?
Write to [email protected] with the article URL and the corrected information. The desk reviews every material claim and aims to publish the correction within two hours of confirmation.
How do I challenge a published correction?
Write to the editor. Where a correction is itself challenged and found wanting, we publish a follow-up correction and add a dated note at the top of the article.
Are non-material edits logged?
No. Non-material edits (typos, headline variants, phrasing) are fixed in place and are not logged here. The reader's understanding of the story does not change.
Where do I see the original version?
Material corrections preserve the original text in the article's revision history, with the published correction note pointing back to what changed. Archived revisions are available on request.
A short note on what to read from the corrections log, and what it tells us about the editorial standards applied to every piece.
The corrections log is the desk's audit trail. It is published in full from the desk's first publication in 2026, with each material correction dated and linked back to the affected article. The log is also a useful way to understand what kind of mistakes the desk makes: a high rate of score or attribution corrections points to a sourcing issue, while a high rate of substitution or minute corrections points to an editing issue. Both are worth fixing at the process level rather than at the article level.
We aim for the corrections log to grow slowly. A desk that publishes corrections faster than it publishes reporting is a desk that is over-confident in its sourcing or under-confident in its editing. The target is the reverse: corrections should be rare, dated, and easy to find. Where a correction is challenged and found wanting, we publish a follow-up correction and add a dated note at the top of the article.
The log is preserved in the page revision history. Where a piece is rewritten with a material correction, the older version is preserved with the published correction note pointing back to what changed. Readers who want to see the original version can request it via the contact page; the editor provides the older text with a brief explanation of the change.